When Andy Lippman and Travis Rich came to Rice (a while ago, I know), they discussed PubPub, an innovative digital publishing platform developed at MIT's Media Lab. This was ostensibly the two presenters' central subject for their talk, but afterward, I felt that they had actually opened two complementary discussions, one about technology and the other about the role of the university and knowledge in broader society. PubPub is an interesting platform, mostly designed to provide a place for the publishing of works that don't fit squarely in one field.
Genevieve Schaad's presentation on February 11 was an interesting look into the operations of Google. Schaad is a program manager for Google Maps and she gave a broad overview of how policy decisions are made. The guiding vision for Google is "Make the world's information free." With Maps, this means organizing everything important to users onto an easily readable geographical representation. As an overall idea of how Google should be, this seems simple enough, but Schaad showed how much of a grind actually doing this work is.
Zeynep Tufekci's Sawyer presentation on February 4 looked at how algorithms, the seemingly objective decision makers of the future, have widespread and unaccounted for social implications. She approached algorithms from three different angles: watching, judging, and nudging.
Nathan Matias raised the question during his presentation on January 28, "How can the average person retake control of technology and mitigate some of its more harmful effects, considering increasing domination by corporate and government interests?" The previous Sawyer talks have all contained, at the very least, undertones of this anxiety, but Matias brought it to the forefront and addressed it in pragmatic terms.
If the Sawyer Seminar has had a central theme so far, it has taught that, paraphrasing Jeremy Dean, our latest speaker, "humanities need tech, but tech needs humanities." Dean, who works as the Director of Education at Hypothes.is, visited Rice on January 14th, to share his vision of annotations attached to all information. He prefaced his presentation with a brief history of his work as a high school teacher, where he instructed his students to use Rap Genius – now Genius – to annotate works like The Great Gatsby.
With apologies for the delay, this post will discuss Tara McPherson's Sawyer presentation, which took place on December 3. Her lecture focused on the use of novel technologies as a way to teach and work in the humanities. Covering the roots of the Digital Humanities, she showed images of projects like the Eames Office, an example of innovative use of architectural space as a new approach to presenting information. Her history contextualized her own digital platforms, Vector and Scalar.
Jon Voss's talk for the Sawyer was something of an outlier among the others so far. Voss isn't an academic and Historypin is not a university-based research project. He started his presentation by playing "Everything in its Right Place" by Radiohead and interspersed with images and video clips, including one from V for Vendetta. The contrast between Voss's background and the audience's made for the most productive part of the discussion.
Aaron Jaffe's presentation was supposed to be held in Herring Hall, but it was clear that he was speaking from inside the belly of the beast. He came to Rice to discuss digital humanities and their place in the university. Jaffe sees the term "STEM" as a marketing ploy that has achieved a great deal of success in receiving funding and status within universities. "Digital Humanities" (or "DH") has acted as an analogous tactic for gaining resources from the other side of campus.
Hi, I'm Jake. I'm a senior studying English and I'd like to officially welcome to my blog for the Sawyer Seminar. For a bit of background, this seminar is run by the Humanities Research Center with a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and it brings in speakers to discuss digital humanities, specifically the production and distribution of knowledge, in the digital age.